Hoe St E17 |
Men
shout at me as I take photos, the cars disrupt my frame, and the fumes choke my
fragile lungs. I see Hoe Street through the lens of my camera, and it looks
awful, containing none of the promises of my dreams. The sweeping curve of the
street is gone, replaced by grey and dusty buildings and the sense of a litter
of chaos.
I’ve always been fascinated by Hoe Street
in Walthamstow, E17, at least, that bit of it which runs from Forest Road to
the High Street. If life was fair and we lived in a different kind of world
(and one that I only push at with my imagination), Hoe Street would be an
ambling walk through beautiful old buildings, with art galleries, cafes, and
bookshops. A place where you engage with the feel of the old, remade
successfully in the present.
I stand in it, perplexed as to why it isn’t
so. Maybe if I thought hard enough, the landscape would change. Yet, here I am,
just seeing the ugliness, the dirt, and the fumes, and wondering how so much
aesthetic promise can be lost. How the struggle against the elements that
disorganise our lives cave in our hopes.
Hoe Street is a kind of front line of
gentrification, a place where possibilities of aesthetic beauty are smashed to
pieces by the combined forces of commerce, planning and people. It is this
place where I will now turn to examine the promises and disruptions of
gentrification.
The spatiality
of gentrification
Gentrification has a physicality, a
geography. Every place that has regenerated, or gentrified, has something in
its physical landscape that delights our visual senses.
Hoe Street has this. Starting from the
crossroads where Forest Road and Hoe Street intersect, and Hoe Street begins,
taking over from Chingford Road like a declaration that you are no longer in
the Essex borders, the Road forms a gentle curve as it progresses towards
Walthamstow Central. It is the curve of a crescent.
Hoe St, the curve |
Any regeneration project would, if thought
about, look at a street like this and make it a centerpiece of change. It has,
as you progress along it, twee Victorian flats above shops, tiny shops below,
and roads branch off to the left and right that are lined with pretty Victorian
cottages. You can almost see the Victorian obsession with making retail and
public space the centerpiece of urban living in its design. It still has trees,
and some shops have complied with the Big Local grant to hand paint signs.
But the Victorian buildings have been
damaged by the sheer lack of contemporary interest in the value of shopping
streets. It is ok, apparently, to rip out sash windows and replace them with
uPVC. It is fine to put satellite dishes on the buildings. The retail street in
London, except in very wealthy areas, is a place for slum living and low-income
housing (if it is housing at all, as opposed to vacant space used by no-one).
The vitality and potential of flats above shops have, for a long time, not been
appealing to people. Did we all so thoroughly buy into the ideal of quiet
living, the cul-de-sac, the detached house, and all the off-road parking of
suburbia? More to the point (and as someone who once engaged with the ‘flat
above’ experience) you are left unprotected by a planning system geared towards
commerce, any commerce. Getting a mortgage on such a building is practically
impossible. As a consequence, they are left unloved and underutilized, except
by landlords.
The chaos |
The shops themselves mostly abound with
neon signs and dirty window frames. Free standing advertisement screens litter
the streetscape. Pavements are not cleaned often and are dotted with chewing
gum. No-one, it seems, is feeling the value of these streets.
Do our shopping streets suffer a lack of
love because of the car? Hoe Street is dominated by traffic, being a major
through road from the North Circular to Layton, Stratford and beyond. Lorries
and buses thread along its narrow streets. Cars stop by the side of the road to
pop into shops and cafes, blocking movement. Trucks unload throughout the day.
Queues of traffic in Hoe St |
Car volume has increased seemingly because
of the controversial ‘mini-Holland’ scheme – where roads are blocked to traffic
- now being extended to roads running parallel to Hoe Street. It helps
residents in these streets to some degree so that their residences are not used
as rat runs. It is also meant to encourage cycling. However, traffic is forced
onto Hoe Street, while the exit route from the crossroads of the High Street
and Hoe Street are narrowed by nearby road layout changes because of the Empire
Cinema. Policy almost always has unintended consequences, and these two
policies – mini-Holland and the Empire development – have impacted on the
potential for a re-envisaged Hoe Street.
That is not to say I have an opinion on
mini-Holland. I support the idea of a car-free city, which would be like my
version of utopia or the beginnings of one. We would feel better without
traffic, making cycling a joy rather than a potential ride of death. Hoe Street
would be amazing if it were fully pedestrianised; indeed, it would never have
become what it is – a dirty and polluted space – without traffic. Mini-Holland
doesn't go far enough, for sure, but it’s either a start, or a scheme that will
mess things up further. Time will tell.
The
aesthetics of architecture
The contemporary building does not often
inspire in London. There is a corporate sparseness and monotone quality to
them. Two recent examples of development illustrate this.
Uninspiring architecture? |
The first is a small block of flats built
on a plot of land on the corner of Hoe Street and Milton Road, a familiar
pastiche of London brick (but looking too square to be good and lacking the
quality of reclaimed materials) and grey window framed squareness. Because the
frontage is so close to the pavement, residents have to put up net curtains,
thus totally negating any bogus attempt at modernism. Of course, people like to
do that in practically all new-build flats. Net curtains are used, probably,
because designers failed to consider innovative window coverage that looks good
and fulfills a dual need for privacy and light. People fill the balconies with junk
because they serve no other purpose (who wants to look at the wonderful view of
the road or yard) and could probably be dispensed with.
The second is the enormous Empire Cinema
development, occupying the corner of Hoe Street and the High Street. A mixture
of cinema, chain restaurants and residences, it is a grey and largely
uninspiring building, the size of which I would argue negates organic
regeneration (think Wood Green in North London, a place where the carbuncle of
the modern shopping centre has rid the place of any possible aesthetic appeal).
Empire Cinema development |
It is popular, however, and given it was
purposefully designed to attract people from a wide geographical reach, it
might account for the increase in vehicles in the area. The restaurants below,
particularly Pizza Express and Yum Yum (a little bit of Stoke Newington in E17,
which is after all the imaginary home of all incoming Walthamstowians), are
often packed. While the corporate cinema has taken off, though, just up the
road is the EMD Cinema, now taken over by Antic Pubs (of the DogStar in Brixton
fame or infamy) and called Mirth.
Mirth |
Originally it was planned as an independent
cinema and entertainment venue but it is now is a bar. Apparently a small
proportion of the EMD may at some point become a bit of a cinema or something,
but right now it's a bar. Only a bar. With occasional, and (I understand)
fraught, use as a music venue, and less fraught use as a pop up craft venue. Sitting
right next to another bar, the juxtaposition of which is more than a little
ironic:
The Victoria, nestled next to Mirth |
The different fortunes of the Empire and
EMD cinemas illustrate how Hoe Street's potential to become a space for an
independent arts scene has never been fulfilled. The Rose & Crown pub
offers a lot of community and cultural potential, and is still busy (although
somewhat overtaken by the Bell, which is not so community minded), but the
possibilities are slowly fading as one form of commerce replaces another.
Rose & Crown |
Another way of thinking about creativity
and waste is the use to which well-situated buildings are put. When walking by
an old and lovely building sitting on the corner of Hoe Street and Tower
Hamlet's Road, I always thought ‘independent arts venue or social centre.’
Imagining a different future? |
It practically screams it, but apparently
only to me, because I was born in the 1960s and came of age in the 1980s when
all that stuff was de rigueur. I've even fantasised about winning the lottery
and buying the building, so have I longed for that vision to become a reality.
But alas, my rapidly diminishing wage won't do it, so the building remains
offices, and the lovely old windows on the top floor stripped out and replaced
by double-glazing.
Contested
commerce
The ‘old’ Hoe Street and the ‘new’
gentrified Hoe Street butt up against each other in an aesthetically conflicted
way.
Here are some of the old:
Snooker hall |
And here are two of the new:
Italian deli |
Craft beer store, just before it opened. Still not Clapton.. |
Of course, the concepts of old and new
applied to these shops may be a misnomer. It is not about when they opened, as there is a constant turnover of shops in Hoe
Street. By old I refer to the old Walthamstow, supposedly ‘down at heel’ and in
need of a makeover. Yet, people make businesses and communities out of these
shops (or they are a front for another kind of business and community).
By new I was referring to gentrification,
but who knows if these businesses will last, and what kinds of conflicts and
difficulties they will encounter in these spaces. Will people shop there (after
all, traffic, busyness and deli food don’t often mix)? Will they get broken
into? Hoe Street is frontier land for cultural entrepreneurs and hipsters, and
the frontier has always been a place of confrontation and violence. One cultural form will win, propelled by
forces outside of Walthamstow control, or anyone’s control.
Because the high street is engaged in a
constant battle to become one thing or another, because of the need, noted by
Jane Jacobs, for complimentary businesses to exist in the same area. It
encourages footfall if several tasks can be undertaken in one visit. It is, we
assume, by gentrification is all-encompassing.
But nestled in How Street have been
alternative spaces, for example, the two antique furniture places that have
been there for many years. Here is one:
Lot One Ten |
The high street is engaged in a constant
battle to become one thing or another, because of the need, noted by Jane
Jacobs, for complimentary businesses to exist in the same area. It encourages
footfall if several tasks can be undertaken in one visit. It is, we assume, by
gentrification is all-encompassing.
One street can tell a huge story about
social change, one taking place right across London. Jonathan Raban said in his
book Soft City that we all struggle to comprehend, and make sense of, the
complexity and rapidity of social change in London. Standing in Hoe Street, and
trying to grasp the threads of change, and shifting between alternate
realities, induces a kind of existential nausea. These are the promises and
disruptions of gentrification, and the witnessing of rapid and unimaginable
change in the space of a small time frame. Maybe we think it into being? That
is London.
This article was written in the spring of 2016, and since then, new hipster and gentrified stores have opened. The Hoe St curve may fulfill its promise, just not in the way I imagined or hoped...
No comments:
Post a Comment